Crime against humanity under the ‘Shadow of Lord Buddha’

(Note: Given below the article published on 20^th October 2007 on burmareview.wordpress.com, the article is still relevant as the situation in Burma has not changed. It is more relevant to know the vision of Bogyoke Aung San - the maker of Burma, when we read statements in Burma’s official media that, ‘Democracy in Myanmar today is at a fledgling stage and still requires patient care and attention” to perpetuate the rule of military at Armed Forces Day and keeping Daw Suu Kyi and 2,100 political prisoners behind bars despite repeated calls from UN, ASEAN and European Union to free them – Rajshekhar, Burma Review)

 

 

On 18th of October 2007, first time, military junta’s official mouthpiece – “The New Light of Myanmar” recognized Daw Aung San Suu’s writings and her analysis on Bogyoke Aung San views on politics and religion to persuade reverend Buddhist monks of Burma to remain silent on the question of Burmese people’s freedom and defend their crime against humanity under the Shadow of Lord Buddha. In an article published in the name of Pothudaw Yay Chan entitled, “Elements harmful to Dhamma and political opportunists”, while quoting, Daw Suu’s book – “Freedom From Fear”, it attempted to prove that, monks should not get involved in politics as even Bogyoke Aung San desired for that.[I] So it becomes important to explore and analyze that, what was Burma’s maker - Bogyoke Aung San’s vision on reverend monk’s role in the society and what is Buddhism all about on this issue, as well as what Daw Suu wanted to tell Burmese people and world in “Freedom from Fear and other writings”?     

 

Although, these sorts of propaganda tactics is not new in Burma by authoritarian rulers like SPDC to present half facts and distorted views on different issues including monk’s role in Politics. It is distorted, because the author took one paragraph of Daw Suu’s “Freedom from Fear”, which was serving his masters objectives (SPDC) against the basic ethos and teachings of Buddhism and leaving other finer points of “Freedom from Fear” away from reader’s eye as it goes against his masters dictates. Despite its masterly propaganda tactics, I’m thankful to the author as he bothered to read “Freedom from Fear” and it would be a great job if other respected General’s read it minutely to understand her views on the role of tatmadaw (army), NLD, democracy, ethnic issues and people of Burma.    

 

 

However by burying Daw Aung San Suu Kyi alive while keeping in detention and away from peoples, media and party, they are doing great national disservice to Burma and world. Because her detention against the principles and great teachings of Theravada Buddhism not only made Burma aloof of her world visions, but it has been also preventing Asia to come closer to Western civilization as pronounced in the philosophy of Asia Cooperation Dialogue and in many Asia Europe Meetings.      

Bogyoke Aung San’s vision on Religion and Politics:  

 

But then important questions emerges that, what is the correct view of Bogyoke Aung San on Monk’s role in Burma? The great Bogyoke Aung San was very clear about his vision on monk’s role in the society. He expected that, great Burmese Buddhist monk’s should not only play an important role of high politics in Burma’s history but also in world history, which they also did in August-September 2007 revolution to protests like earlier occasions as wished by Bogyoke Aung San and established their golden mark in Modern Asian and World History. While speaking at the inaugural address at the AFPFL (Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League) convention in January 1946 in his speech entitled, “Problems for Burma’s Freedom”, Bogyoke Aung Said, that, “Reverend Sanghas! You have a tremendous role to play in world history, and if you succeed, you will be revered by the entire mankind for ages to come. This is one of the high functions ordained by your religion and this is the highest politics which you can do for your country and people. Go amongst our peoples, preach the doctrine of unity and love, carry the message of higher freedom to every nook and corner of the country, freedom of religious worship, freedom to preach and spread the Dharma anywhere and anytime, freedom from fear, ignorance, superstitions; teach our people to rely upon themselves and reconstruct themselves materially, spiritually and otherwise. You have these and many more noble tasks before you. Will you or will you not rise equal to your tasks? The answer lies doubtless with you.”[II]      

 

As mentioned in the above speech of Bogyoke Aung San, one can clearly see that maker of Burma wanted that reverend Monks should work to establish “freedom from fear” not only in Burma but also in world to truly achieve the basic ethos of Buddhism. It is a naked truth that, how threatening pledges has been imposed and daily taken from the monks and people, who recently protested against the views expressed by Bogyoke Aung San on Sangha’s role to establish “Freedom From Fear” and “message of higher freedom to every nook and corner of the country”.      

 

Bogyoke Aung San as a maker of national defence forces had been long aware of the danger of army taking over the rights of freedom of people in Burma. So in explaining ‘a system of social responsibility’, he said, that, “The original conception of the “state” as a solution of the growing problems of “society”, the “state” holding power derived from “society”, this original conception gradually become lost to view in the course of social history. The cause is the tendency of the “state” to rise higher and higher above the heads of the people, until “State” and “Society” becomes totally divorced.” He further stresses that, “If the state is personified in one or group of persons arrogating to itself and itself alone, forever, the powers which in fact were delegated to it by the people, then the original concept that the state after all is a creation of the people becomes lost.”[III] Here, SLORC or SPDC, as a group of people, who has even not derived power from the people through election, has turned into “state” higher and higher above the heads of the people as feared by Bogyoke Aung San. The junta wants to bring un-elected elements of the army in proposed Burmese parliament or Pyithu Hlutaw through reservation as pronounced in National Convention in the name of genuine democracy to control “state” against the wishes of Bogyoke Aung San.       

 

On 19th of October 2007, through the announcement no. 2/2007 of SPDC, a fifty-four member commission for drafting Burma’s proposed constitution was formed.[IV] But it is important to know that what type of constitution Bogyoke Aung San wished for Burma.  Not even two months before his death, on 23rd of May 1947 address at the AFPFL  convention held at the Jubilee Hall in Rangoon, he said, that, “The kind of constitution the new democracy would envisage is one which would place power in the hands of the masses through their elected representatives from top to bottom. If they have no confidence in their representatives they must have the power to recall them. This will make a clean sweep of the existing bureaucratic form of government.”[V]      

 

Now, I again return to the theme of Daw Suu’s writing on Bogyoke Aung San’ socio-political vision of monks role in politics. Whether Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is wrong in her historical analysis of Bogyoke Aung San thoughts on Monk’s role because in her book “Freedom from Fear”, she wrote that Bogyoke Aung San desired that, “Monks should not get involved in politics” and I have quoted Bogyoke Aung San’s original speech as Monks should play a greater and higher role of politics? No, the answer is absolutely not. She is right in her analysis, but her later analysis in the same book was intentionally left by the author of the New Light of Myanmar  (or may be not understood) reveals that, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Bogyoke Aung San both desired a greater social-political role for monks in modern history, which was missed by Pothudaw Yay Chan. It is well undrstood by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in the same book that, “weak logic, inconsistencies and alienation from the people are common features of authoritarianism.”[VI]     

 

Both, Bogyoke Aung San and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi wanted that in normal condition when politics is playing its true role of serving people, then Monks should refrain from politics and religion should be not mixed with politics, and even India’s greatest leader and father of nation - Mahatma Gandhi also believed on these values. But here comes the “BIG NORMAL SITUATION”, when politics is truly serving the people. But in present day Burma, freedom of speech, thoughts and actions had been freezed with the force of the barrel of gun and by an un-elected group taking the role of “State” as warned by Bogyoke Aung San. Most importantly, the whole leadership of the nation, elected in the May 1990 elections by the people’s mandate had been forced to flee from the country and those who remained had been put under the prison cells and many died in their journey to establish freedom in Burma. So in this extraordinary situation of Burma, what would be the monk’s and other peoples role in Burmese history has been said clearly by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi defining teachings of Buddhism, in “Freedom from Fear,” and I quote, “The teachings of Buddhism which delve into the various causes of sufferings identify greed or lust – the passion for indulging an intemperate appetite – as the first Ten Impurities or Dasa-Kilesa which stand in the way of a tranquil, wholesome state of mind. On the other hand, much value is attached to liberality or generosity, which heads such lists as the Ten Perfections of the Buddha or Dasa-paramita, the ten Virtues which should be practiced and the Ten Duties of Kings,” unquote. She further clarifies, “This emphasis on liberality should not be regarded as a facile endorsement of alms-giving based on canny calculations of possible benefits in the way of worldly prestige or other –worldly rewards,” which can be easily seen in SPDC’s General’s giving alms and titles to Sangha and Monks to perpetuate their authoritarian rule. Daw Suu Kyi, further quotes, the great Sayadaw of the famous Mahagandharun monastery of Amarapura – Sayadaw Ashin Janaka Bivamsa’s saying, that, “Liberality without morality cannot be pure. An act of charity committed for the sake of earning praise or prestige or a place in a heavenly abode tantamount to an act of greed.”[VII]   

 

How Bogyoke Aung San differentiated “politics of serving people” with religion’ could be understood from the following speech of Burma’s maker? Yes, he draws a line between the politics and religion but line is drawn when politics must see that the individual also has his rights, including the right to freedom of religious worships as Bogyoke Aung San says, “Religion is a matter of individual conscience while politics is a social science,” and stresses that, “Of course, as a social science, politics must see that the individual also has his rights, including the right to freedom of religious worship. Here we must stop and draw the line definitely between politics and religion.”[VIII] Now the question comes that whether as a discipline of social science under military rule in Burma “politics is serving the purpose of insuring individuals rights of freedom from fear” as said to Sangha by Bogyoke Aung San or it is dirty politics played by military junta to perpetuate their rule through reserving seats for tatmadaw in forthcoming Burmese parliament and debarring Daw Aung San Suu Kyi to contest the election of 1990 and future elections?         

 

Bogyoke Aung San never wanted that, Burmese people should remain aloof from politics. He wanted that politics should be changed for freedom and better life. In his speech to Burmese people, he says, “You have to live and get certain things that are yours for your living, and this is your politics. This is your everyday life; and as your everyday life changes, so change your politics. It is for you to have such opportunities for your livelihood and a better life that we say there must be freedom, freedom to live, freedom to create and develop nationally and individually, freedom which can raise your and our standards without effecting others! This is politics. Politics, then, is quite human! It is not dirty. It is not dangerous. It is not parochial. It is neither magic nor superstition. It is not above understanding.”[IX]    

 

However the reality is that, in contemporary Burma, politics has become dangerous and above understanding. If one raises voice to establish freedom and people’s rights, it turns out to be dangerous and those who speak including reverend Monks, find themselves behind prison, torture and deaths against teachings of Lord Buddha.      

 

Politics in Burma has become above understanding against Bogyoke Aung San’s vision of politics, because junta does not want to talk to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi without any pre-condition attached to it, despite United Nations, ASEAN and world communities many appeals. And even when a minister was appointed as a messenger between the government and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, it is said that it was done because of UN envoy’s appeal.  Why there is a need to appoint a communicator, when both Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Senior General Than Shwe lives few miles away and if the intentions are good? Those who thinks, that, by visiting Daw Aung San Suu without any pre-condition, would make them small; then, they have not understood the true teachings of Lord Buddha and Buddhism. It shows that politics in Burma from junta’s part is not above understanding as wished by Burma’s great leader Bogyoke Aung San.     

 

Moreover, even today’s article (20 October 2007) in the New Light of Myanmar (NLM) on Daw Aung San Suu Kyi written by Chan Mya Aye, attempts to belittle Daw Suu’s and NLD’s role in modern history of Burma, while first claiming to be her supporter then turning to be a critique like a fine propagandist.[X] It is bizarre and most heinous crime against the percepts of Theravada Buddhism like earlier ones that, junta publishes articles in the New Light of Myanmar against Daw Aung San Suu Kyi directly addressed to her but does not gives her chance to respond freely to the concerned articles in different media. It also indicates that, appointed minister to talk with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is a mere eye wash and buying time tactics of military junta from the International Institutions like – UN, UNSC, ASEAN etc. and they want to prolong dialogue till Beijing Olympics.       

 

Junta’s acceptance of awarding Capital Punishment on mere Protests against Lord Buddha’s teachings and International Law:    

 

In addition, in yesterday’s official newspaper – NLM (19th of October 2007), it is accepted by junta’s writer – Mi Khin Thant, that even saying a words against government and freedom of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and political prisoners can lead to violation of Section 121-122 and according to these laws “capital punishment” can be given.[XI] Now question emerges, that, whether these sorts of freedom Bogyoke Aung San desired for Burma and in these conditions what should be the roles of monks in Aung San’s said vision? It also indicates towards the blatant violation of international law and United Nations Charter by junta by their acceptance on awarding capital punishment for mere protest to their rule. It also proves that many faceless innocent people and reverend monks of Burma would have suffered capital punishment through these inhuman laws in their struggle for freedom as outlined by Bogyoke Aung San.    

 

So, it is important to revisit, that, what was Lord Buddha’s original teaching on capital punishment? Lord Buddha clearly denounces capital punishment and taking away life of anyone by anyone. Referring the thoughts of The Light of Asia, the former President and modern Asia’s greatest philosophers of oriental thought Shri S. Radhakrishnan writes that, “Lord Buddha declares in ‘Samyutta Nikaya’ that, Anyone, O Sariputta, who lays down this body and takes another one, I call blameworthy.”[XII] Although SPDC shows great reverence towards the Sangha by donating alms and gifts together with titles but awards capital punishment to their fellow citizens for mere protests and demand of freedom of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners in Burma.    

 

Daw Aung San Suu Kyi understood well then any other leaders of Burma about junta’s tactics and strategy of defaming the democracy movement as a western ploy well before her detention, which is presently appearing daily in official media – NLM, in the name of “people’s desire” accusing DVB, RFA, BBC, VOA, AFP etc for instigating the protests. And she writes in her essay entitled, “In Quest of Democracy,” that, “It was predictable that as soon as the issue of human rights became an integral part of the movement for democracy the official media should start ridiculing and condemning the whole concept of human rights, dubbing it a western artifact alien to traditional values,”[XIII] and relating it with great teachings of Lord Buddha against capital punishment and importance of human life like Bogyoke Aung San, She elaborates that, “Buddhism, the foundation of traditional Burmese culture places the greatest value on man, who alone of all beings can achieve the supreme state of Buddhahood. Each man has in him the potential to realize the truth through his own will and endeavour and to help others to realize it. Human life is therefore is infinitely precious…But despotic governments do not recognize the precious human component of the state, seeing its citizens only as a faceless, mindless – and helpless - mass to be manipulated at will.”[XIV]    

 

Probably, for a moment, it is good for Burma, that national capital has been shifted to “Nay Pyi Taw” by military junta, now at least the great holy Shwedagon Pagoda of Rangoon, where Lord Buddha’s bright light exists, is not there to witness orders of crime of capital punishment committed against humanity under laws like Section 121-122 or in the name of Bogyoke Aung San’s social-political vision.

 

ENDNOTES:  

 

[I] Pothudaw Yay Chan, Elements harmful to Dhamma and political opportunists, The New Light of Myanmar, 18th of October 2007, Volume XV, Number-185, , Rangoon, Burma, p.6.

 

[II] Josef Silverstein, The Political Legacy of Aung San, Data Paper No. 86, Southeast Asia Program, Department of Asian Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, June 1972, p. 55-56.

[III] Ibid, p.93.

[IV] Commission for Drafting State Constitution formed, The New Light of Myanmar, 19th of October 2007, Volume – XV, Number- 186, Rangoon, Burma, pp.1, 3, and 4.

[V] Note No. 2, p.95.

[VI] Aung San Suu Kyi, Freedom From Fear and other writings, Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, Year 1995 (First Published in 1991), p.175.

[VII] Ibid, p.242.

[VIII] Note No. 2, p.55

[IX] Ibid., p.54.

[X] Chan Mya Aye, Aunty Suu, we are living in hope or Our only wish is to see a win-win situation -1, The New Light of Myanmar, 20th  of October 2007, Volume XV, Number-187, , Rangoon, Burma, p.8-9. 

[XI] Mi Khin Thant, Don’t get yourselves used by unscrupulous elements, The New Light of Myanmar, 19th of October 2007, Volume XV, Number-186, , Rangoon, Burma, p.6-7. 

[XII] S. Radhakrishnan, Eastern Religions and Western Thought, A Galaxy Book, Oxford University Press, New York, 1959, p.182.

[XIII] Note No. 6, p.174.

[XIV] Ibid, p.174.

    

 

(THE END)

  

*****************************************

US: No Change in Burma Policy

In its daily press briefings held on 26^th March, United States has once again confirmed that, the visit of Director level official to Burma couldn’t be seen as a change in US policy concerning economic sanction. The US State Department Acting Deputy Spokesperson – Mr. Gordon Duguid while replying to number of questions on a senior US official visit to Burma said, “the visit also happened in the past. As new office directors come into their position, they do visit the embassies that are under their charge, and in this case, Mr. Blake did visit the U.S. Embassy in Rangoon, and did have contact with Burmese officials. However, his discussion with those officials is not something that I have anything for you on.”

 

While responding to the specific question on US economic sanction on Burma, Mr. Gordon stated that, “I have no indication that any decisions have been made at this point”, however, said that, “our policy on several areas, wide-ranging areas, are under review and when we have finished a policy review, we will be happy at that time to give a fuller explanation.” Later in its press release no. PRN 262, the US State Department also declared that, ‘prior to 24^th March meeting with Burmese officials, our Charge d’Affaires in Rangoon, Larry Dinger, was the last US official to meet with the Foreign Minister of Burma - Nyan Win for a private meeting on January 5, 2009.’ The US State Department statement came after the news published in the official media of Burma – ‘The New Light of Myanmar’ that, ‘Director of the Office for Mainland Southeast Asia – Mr. Stephen Blake, met with Burmese Foreign Minister Nyan Win on last Tuesday.’

**************************

US disappointed by Junta’s ignoring the call of ‘International Community’ and ‘UNSC’

In a press briefings issued on 24^th March 2009 (PRN: 2009/254), US Department of State – Acting Department Spokesperson – Mr. Robert Wood has ‘once again  urged the Burmese authorities to release all political prisoners and initiate a genuine dialogue that can help move the country forward’. Mr. Wood also stated in his press briefings that, “We are disappointed that the regime continues to ignore the calls of the international community, including the UN Security Council (UNSC), to release the more than 2,100 political prisoners immediately and unconditionally.”

United States official statement came after the news of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has opined recently that the detention of Burma’s democracy activist Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is illegal under the domestic laws of her own country and international law. It is noteworthy that, it was the first time the 'U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention' found that the confinement of Daw Suu Kyi, who has spent more than 13 of the last 19 years under house arrest, illegal under Burmese law. Although there had been many regular appeals by the UN Secretary General's office and ASEAN resolutions to free political prisoners in Burma including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi for the genuine national reconciliation process.

 

The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued opinions affirming that the continued detentions of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, Aung Myin, Ko Jimmy, Paw Oo Tun, and Mtay Win Aung are arbitrary and unjustified and urged the Burmese government to release these individuals immediately.

  

Last year before the upcoming referendum on Burma’s proposed constitution, on 2^nd of May 2008 Press Release of  UN, the UN Security Council stressed unsuccessfully – “the need for the upcoming referendum and elections in Burma to include the full participation of all political actors and respect for fundamental political freedoms”. (1) However, the referendum had been held Daw Suu Kyi and other major political leaders behind the bars in the midst of natural calamity of ‘Nargis’ as well as the call given by the UNSC “to establish the conditions and create an atmosphere conducive to an inclusive and credible process” for the referendum.  

*****************************

Burma's Democratic Agenda Page Can't be found: the ASEAN Way

When you visit the ASEAN Secretariat official web site – aseansec.org, you will find buzz ling news update at the front page of the web site of many ASEAN initiatives? In the left panel links - you have important web linkages - about ASEAN, member countries, ASEAN Statistics, ASEAN Summits etc. including information and linkages with previous ASEAN ministerial meetings. If you attempt to find ASEAN’s clear intervention towards Burma’s democratic agenda and resolution concerning freedom of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, you have to do a little hard work of searching different web pages? Fortunately for you, after clicking ‘Peace and Security’ web link of the left side panel of the aesansec.org, you will reach to ASEAN’S ‘Politics and Security’ section and its link with ‘Political Statement’ segment concerning organization’s official statements regarding member nations of ASEAN including Burma and other issues like – Human Rights, Cambodia, East Timor, Southern Africa etc. After reaching ‘Myanmar / Burma segment’ concerning ASEAN’s official political statements about the golden land, you will get excerpts of ONLY two joint communiqué of the ASEAN Ministerial meeting (AMM) – the 37^th ASEAN ministerial meeting held at Jakarta from 29-30, June 2004 and 36^th ASEAN ministerial meeting organized at Phnom Penh, 16-17, June 2003.  Please don’t feel very elated of catching ASEAN on Burma’s democratic agenda and sense of ‘Eureka’, because after clicking joint communiqué of 37^th ASEAN ministerial meeting, you will get a very lovely message, which happens by accessing – unauthorized access of government defense sites – “Page Can not be found”! (#)  

 

The 37^th ASEAN Ministerial meeting had been also important for welcoming the signing of the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women in the ASEAN Region and believed that the Declaration would further strengthen regional cooperation, collaboration and coordination for the purpose of eliminating violence against women in the region, either individually or collectively apart from adopting proposal seeking freedom of political prisoners in Burma.  

 

It is not a surprising thing of not finding the 37^th AMM joint communiqué concerning Burma’s democratization on ASEAN Secretariat official web site. I can well remember that, some years back when I contacted a senior ASEAN official (Now holds a very key position in the ASEAN Secretariat and for his position I can’t disclose his name) about his reaction and resource material available on Burma’s Democratic movement in ASEAN Library at Jakarta. He replied that, ‘Burma’s democratic issue is very sensitive matter; you can talk about business-economic cooperation but not about democracy in Burma and ASEAN library unpublished documents are only accessible to officials. Although he/she encouraged me to become part of the official delegation and helping me but I replied that, I’m a commoner and not a high ranking official of my country.

 

Although fortunately for you, by clicking 36^th joint communiqué of ASEAN ministerial meeting, you get a sigh of relief and obtain precious official political statement of the organization concerning Burma still locked in the historical time frame of UN envoy Razali Ismail days and I quote, “We discussed the recent political developments in Myanmar, particularly the incident of 30 May 2003. We noted the efforts of the Government of Myanmar to promote peace and development. In this connection, we urged Myanmar to resume its efforts of national reconciliation and dialogue among all parties concerned leading to a peaceful transition to democracy. We welcomed the assurances given by Myanmar that the measures taken following the incident were temporary and looked forward to the early lifting of restrictions placed on Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD members. We also reaffirmed our continued support for the efforts of the UNSG Special Representative Tan Sri Razali Ismail”, unquote. Whether Daw Suu Kyi’s restriction lifted or assurances given to ASEAN by Burma’s military regime regarding NLD members had been temporary in nature are well known facts to the world community? 

 

Moreover, it was not only in 36^th and 37^th ASEAN Ministerial (AMM) meeting, the ASEAN discussed and passed the joint communiqué for the release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners in Burma including dialogue with all parties concerned. From the 36^th AMM to 41^st AMM held in Singapore, it had been a routine course for ASEAN Ministerial meeting to make a humble appeal to the Burma’s ruling military junta for the release of Daw Suu Kyi and other political prisoners without any significant results.

 

In its last, 41^st AMM held at Singapore on 21^st July 2008; having a theme of – “One ASEAN at the Heart of Dynamic Asia”, ASEAN  recognized Junta’s sham constitution referendum process negating its own earlier passed joint communiqué of appeal to first release all the political prisoners and  start a dialogue process for the national reconciliation. As the 41^st AMM states – “We took note of the briefing by Myanmar on the recent developments in the process of national reconciliation and its peaceful transition to democracy, as envisaged in the roadmap to democracy; in particular, the adoption of the State Constitution of 2008 by referendum. We urged Myanmar to take bolder steps towards a peaceful transition to democracy in the near future, and working towards the holding of free and fair General Elections in 2010. While recognizing the steps undertaken by the Government of Myanmar to conduct meetings with all concerned parties, including the NLD leadership, we reiterated our calls for the release of all political detainees, including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, to pave the way for meaningful dialogue involving all parties concerned.”  It further states and I quote, “We recognized the fact that Myanmar has tried to address many and complex challenges. We reaffirmed our commitment to remain constructively engaged with Myanmar as part of building the ASEAN Community. We encouraged Myanmar to continue to work closely with the Good Offices of the UN Secretary-General and his Special Advisor Ibrahim Gambari in ensuring an inclusive process towards national reconciliation. In this regard, we welcomed Myanmar’s agreement to the upcoming visits of Mr. Tomas Ojea Quintana, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar in August 2008, and Professor Ibrahim Gambari in August 2008, and reiterated our call for Myanmar to extend its full support for their missions,” unquote.

 

Even in a recently concluded 14^th ASEAN Summit held at Cha-am/Hua Hin (Thailand), from 28 February to 1^st March 2009, the Host Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva of Thailand spoke in his press briefings that, “The ASEAN leaders encouraged Myanmar to continue cooperation with the United Nations and to make sure that the roadmap continues according to plan, and that the process would be as inclusive as possible, which includes, of course, the continuation of the release of prisoners or political detainees and also the participation of political parties in the upcoming election.” (1) The statement given by Thai Prime Minister in 14^th ASEAN Summit had been coherent with the 41^st AMM resolution recognizing Junta’s sham referendum and their roadmap of democracy without achieving first the task of release of political prisoners in Burma including Daw Suu Kyi as passed in the earlier ASEAN Ministerial Meetings and many other UN resolutions.

 

Although interestingly, the host Thai Prime Minister – Abhisit Vejjajiva’s opening ceremony speech at 14^th ASEAN Summit (28 February 2009) talks of making “ASEAN more people-centred as well as protection and promotion of human rights and fundamental freedoms as the key feature of ASEAN Community.” It also highlights the historical journey of ASEAN – “From Lam Taen to Cha-am/Hua Hin of last forty two years, which led ASEAN to the fulfillment of one dream, that of ASEAN’s Founding Fathers, and to the beginning of yet another -- that of building and completing a “people-centered”, dynamic and “compassionate” ASEAN Community for all.  

  

In addition, even the ASEAN’s ‘POLITICAL-SECURITY COMMUNITY BLUEPRINT’ adopted on 1^st of March 2009 envisages – ‘Promotions of Principles of Democracy’ (Section-A.1.8) and ‘Promotion and Protection of human rights’ (Section – A.1.5). Although, whether ASEAN will be able to become a real ‘people-centered’ and ‘compassionate’ organization concerning Burma has yet to be seen? However unfortunately in reality since the appointment of Mr. Gambari as a special UN envoy on Burma, it has more worked to legitimize the Junta’s roadmap of democracy without achieving the task of freeing political prisoners in Burma.

 

(Note: The last part of promised post entitled – “John F. Kennedy, J. L.  Nehru, Bogyoke Aung San and Daw Suu Kyi: Four Personalities - One Soul (Part-III)”, would appear at later dates as I’m away from my original place of work and not well)

  

Endnotes:

# the 37^th AMM joint communiqué officially states – “We noted the briefing given by Myanmar on the reconvening of its National Convention and the development thereon. We acknowledged the potential of the Convention in paving the way for new constitution and the holding of elections in keeping with it. We recalled and emphasized the continued relevance of the Joint Communiqué of the 36th AMM and the Chairman’s Press Statement of the 9th ASEAN Summit. In this regard, we underlined the need for the involvement of all strata of Myanmar society in the on-going National Convention. We encouraged all concerned parties in Myanmar to continue their efforts to effect a smooth transition to democracy. We recognized the role of the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General in assisting Myanmar to achieve this goal.”

 

1. Daniel Schearf, ASEAN Urges Burma to Release Political Prisoners, VOA News, 1^st of March 2009.

 

(The End)

*********************************